Apr
7
2009
2000 To Current
Author: mprokesAlpha Edition!, e-mail spelling/grammer/topic suggestions to mattprokes@gmail.com

The Professional Developer Series
Volume 2, Web Development
Chapter 1.2 History Of Web Development
Page: #9
I am not saying though that javascript did not have its ups before 2004; early versions of outlook in exchange 2000 were coded in js, even yahoo mail/chat used js. Though if any developer looks at the literature pre-2004 it was mostly on how to create pop-up windows and make text fly around the screen. It was not seen as the serious language that it is now. A second reason for the lag of javascript has to do with the time involved with the creation of xml libraries for popular server languages. Since xml and json are the only ways to deliver data to javascript this also slowed the adoption rate. A third reason being the term AJAX was first coined as recent as 2005, javascript saw significant growth after gmail and post-ajax.
Today javascript enjoys the title of being the most popular programming language on the planet, java has shifted to being one of the most popular server development languages. So at the end of the day everyone was happy. Flash is used in many ways, but it is most often seen in popular video sites such as youtube leveraging its video capabilities. Applets are used to a much lesser extent, I have seen them deployed though for securing data transfers, and when the java api is needed. Java applets were fairly mis-positioned though, since java user interface is mainly intended for desktop applications sun shifted focus to launch-able internet applications via webstart. Java applet technology was not able to compete effectively against (designer oriented) flash studio, and the sizable consumption of the flash player.
Since distribution of a technology is all that matters regarding the internet, sun handicapped java with its microsoft lawsuit, and under-capitalizing its consumer product. Sun had the classic issue of being to tech oriented, and not nearly as consumer focused as they should of been. Imagine a bunch of geeks creating a technology so advanced it would drive the industry for the next 15 years, but not having a clue what products to make with it or how to sell it. That is like creating a video game console, but having no titles for it. This is the issue that plagued sun, they were a hardware company and not a software company and did not make competitive consumer products for their invention. Eventually, Sun was pushed to the wayside an end ominous of xerox, apple (pre 1999), etc. whos’ ideas other companies capitalized from.
As a side note: I often see suns fate similar to that of apple back in the 80′s. Sun and Apple both thought they “owned” a market, and the ideas that flowed through that new market. This is a fatal mistake, because a company never actually “owns” a market until they create consumer products which justify ownership. This is similar to the idea of filing a patent, and never capitalizing on that patent. If you do not capitalize on a patent for which you own, when someone else does, you may lose entitlement to “said” patent. There is not one company out there; not one, who owns a market but yet has no top-of-the-line consumer product for that market. At the end of the day companies own products/services, and products/services own parts of a market. More on this in Volume 1, The Software Company, but just something to keep in mind.
Update: 04/21/2009, Sun Was Bought By Oracle